ChiliProject is not maintained anymore. Please be advised that there will be no more updates.

We do not recommend that you setup new ChiliProject instances and we urge all existing users to migrate their data to a maintained system, e.g. Redmine. We will provide a migration script later. In the meantime, you can use the instructions by Christian Daehn.

Wiki Diff somehow off (Bug #594)

Added by Ferdinand Thommes at 2011-08-25 08:32 pm. Updated at 2011-09-10 07:27 am.

Status:Closed Start date:2011-08-25
Priority:Normal Due date:
Assignee:- % Done:

0%
Category:Wikis
Target version:2.3.0
Remote issue URL: Affected version:2.1.1

Description

Looking at a diff on the wiki, we get confusing data.
Screenshot1 shows user coruja as editor from 67 to 68
Screenshot2 tells a different story
Related to #593

Associated revisions

Revision c9906480
Added by Jean-Philippe Lang at 2009-01-24 12:31 pm

Merged nested projects branch. Removes limit on subproject nesting (#594).

git-svn-id: svn+ssh://rubyforge.org/var/svn/redmine/trunk@2304 e93f8b46-1217-0410-a6f0-8f06a7374b81

History

#1
Updated by Ferdinand Thommes at 2011-08-25 08:35 pm

edit:is it related to #593?

#2
Updated by Felix Schäfer at 2011-08-26 07:17 am

Is this on all wiki pages or only on a specific one? Did you have any problems during the migration to 2.0? Could you have a look at the journals table, specifically of the type WikiContentJournal, to see if you can find the history of the wiki page, and if it looks ok?

#3
Updated by Felix Schäfer at 2011-08-26 07:20 am

(I just had a look at the wiki here and one internal installation, and I couldn't find discrepancies, so for all intents and purposes I'll assume you have inconsistent data…)

  • Status changed from Open to Needs more information

#4
Updated by Ferdinand Thommes at 2011-08-27 06:12 pm

Please have a look at this testcase
You should be able to reproduce the bug. Thanks.

#5
Updated by Alf Gaida at 2011-08-28 12:37 am

Felix Schäfer wrote:

Is this on all wiki pages or only on a specific one? Did you have any problems during the migration to 2.0? Could you have a look at the journals table, specifically of the type WikiContentJournal, to see if you can find the history of the wiki page, and if it looks ok?

  • this is on all wiki pages
  • no problems, fresh 2.0 installation
  • WikiContentJournal is empty
  • journal looks ok for me, see paste

http://pastebin.com/WjZcipqB

#6
Updated by Ferdinand Thommes at 2011-09-09 09:23 am

should :version in:
:wiki_diff_url => url_for(:controller => 'wiki', :action => 'diff', roject_id => wiki_content.project, :id => wiki_content.page.title, :version => wiki_content.version)
be :next_version or the like?

#7
Updated by Felix Schäfer at 2011-09-10 07:27 am

The diff view used a method on the journals that doesn't do the exact same thing as it did before, corrected in 225a158.

  • Target version set to 2.3.0
  • Status changed from Needs more information to Closed

Also available in: Atom PDF