ChiliProject is not maintained anymore. Please be advised that there will be no more updates.

We do not recommend that you setup new ChiliProject instances and we urge all existing users to migrate their data to a maintained system, e.g. Redmine. We will provide a migration script later. In the meantime, you can use the instructions by Christian Daehn.

Issue category sharing (Feature #234)

Added by Daniel Neis at 2011-02-27 09:31 pm. Updated at 2012-07-08 07:45 pm.

Status:Open Start date:2011-02-27
Priority:Normal Due date:
Assignee:- % Done:

0%
Category:Issue tracking
Target version:-
Remote issue URL: Affected version:

Description

Hello,

i am submitting a patch that was recently submited to redmine that implements issue category sharing like issue version.
Here is the link to the redmine issue: http://www.redmine.org/projects/redmine/issues/5358

The submitted patch was created with a git diff between redmine and a personal branch on github:
https://github.com/danielneis/redmine/tree/5358-issue.category.sharing

Hope you like,
Daniel

category-share.diff (9.6 kB) Daniel Neis, 2011-02-27 09:31 pm

History

#1
Updated by Daniel Neis at 2011-02-27 09:31 pm

  • File category-share.diff added

#2
Updated by Eric Davis at 2011-02-27 10:27 pm

Thanks for the patch. I've heard of someone doing a 'systemwide' set of categories but I never thought of sharing categories. I think I like sharing more.

I don't see any tests in your patch file. Are you planning to add some?

  • Status changed from Open to Needs more information

#3
Updated by Daniel Neis at 2011-02-27 11:35 pm

Hello,

i am happy you like sharing more =)
I am not used to write tests, but i think i can copy the ones from version like what i did with the rest, if it is okay to you.

Also, the "issues summary report" does not count sub-projects. I was thinking about add "(Don't) Include sub-projects" link (maybe next to the "Report" title).

Ah! I've forked chili project in github and setup a branch for this issue:
https://github.com/danielneis/chiliproject/tree/234-issue.category.sharing

Kind regards,
Daniel

#4
Updated by Jan Wedekind at 2011-06-06 01:06 pm

Just found this issue searching for the topic. That would be quite helpful and I also like the sharing much more than system wide definition. I think it's easier to handle (just like version sharing vs. Time Tracking activities).

Will this go into one of the future versions?

Can I help with tests in some way?
cheers,
jan

#5
Updated by Daniel Neis at 2011-06-06 07:54 pm

Hello, Jan

if you can write some unit tests, they will be welcome =)

kind regards,
Daniel

#6
Updated by Daniele Segato at 2011-08-25 12:50 pm

Any news about this issue?
I really like to see this feature in chiliproject.

#7
Updated by XXX XXX at 2012-03-27 09:25 pm

I would like to see this feature in ChiliProject as well. Is it possible to select this one as the main feature for the next minor release (3.2.0)?

Here is a related article about this on Redmine: http://www.redmine.org/boards/1/topics/16060

#8
Updated by Tomáš Jukin at 2012-04-07 10:50 pm

Lukas Kubanek wrote:

I would like to see this feature in ChiliProject as well. Is it possible to select this one as the main feature for the next minor release (3.2.0)?

Here is a related article about this on Redmine: http://www.redmine.org/boards/1/topics/16060

+1

This is IMHO a very important feature... So?

  • Target version set to 3.2.0
  • Status changed from Needs more information to Ready for review

#9
Updated by Felix Schäfer at 2012-06-05 03:50 pm

Tomáš Jukin wrote:

This is IMHO a very important feature... So?

Tomáš, from what I can read there are no tests for this yet, so this is not ready for review yet either, please refrain from changing the status if you aren't sure everything needed (especially when it's been asked for in the issue) is there yet.

I like the idea though, can someone write tests for this and send a pull request? Thanks!

  • Status changed from Ready for review to Open

#10
Updated by Holger Just at 2012-06-09 05:44 pm

Pulling this out of 3.2.0 as it was not ready on release day.

  • Target version deleted (3.2.0)

#11
Updated by Daniele Segato at 2012-06-09 06:12 pm

Holger which will be the new target for this issue?

#12
Updated by Raphael MESSNER at 2012-07-01 01:39 pm

I'm waiting for this feature too.
Do you plan to include it to a version soon ?

#13
Updated by Tomáš Jukin at 2012-07-08 07:41 pm

+1, any news?

#14
Updated by Felix Schäfer at 2012-07-08 07:45 pm

Tomáš Jukin wrote:

+1, any news?

See notes 2 and 9: still no tests.

Also available in: Atom PDF