ChiliProject is not maintained anymore. Please be advised that there will be no more updates.
We do not recommend that you setup new ChiliProject instances and we urge all existing users to migrate their data to a maintained system, e.g. Redmine. We will provide a migration script later. In the meantime, you can use the instructions by Christian Daehn.
[Decided] - What should we call the official repository?
Replies (4)
RE: What should we call the official repository?
-
Added by Felix Schäfer at 2011-02-11 07:33 am
ChiliMaster? cp/m? :-D
I think master, stable and unstable can be understood as those from the official repo unless you explicitly say "my master" or something like that.
RE: What should we call the official repository?
-
Added by Eric Davis at 2011-02-11 07:03 pm
Felix Schäfer wrote:
I think master, stable and unstable can be understood as those from the official repo unless you explicitly say "my master" or something like that.
That's what I think too. Assume 'chiliproject/{branch}' unless there we talk about my, mine, or a direct user (thegcat/master).
Eric Davis
RE: What should we call the official repository?
-
Added by Muntek Singh at 2011-02-11 11:29 pm
Felix Schäfer wrote:
ChiliMaster? cp/m? :-D
I think master, stable and unstable can be understood as those from the official repo unless you explicitly say "my master" or something like that.
Thirded
RE: [closed] What should we call the official repository?
-
Added by Holger Just at 2011-02-12 08:29 am
I'm going to conclude this thread. We just call it master, stable, unstable unless there is any confusion about which repo we mean.
--Holger
(1-4/4)